Russia: Vladimir Putin addresses rally in Moscow
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Vladimir Putin has long followed a macho doctrine and in the late Noughties, he was often photographed in a way to make him depict him as manly. The Russian President was seen bare-chested, flexing his muscles while pulling trout from the Siberian river Khemchik, riding a horse, petting polar bears and tracking tigers with preservationists. But Professor Mark Galeotti, author of the 2019 work We Need to Talk about Putin, has told how the latter publicity stunt did not go as planned.
The University College London lecturer explained that Putin was cultivating his “macho man of all seasons” persona at the time.
Putin has frequently been described as an animal lover, adoring big cats and owning several dogs over the years. In 2008, he got involved in the conservation of the Amur tiger, also known as the Siberian tiger.
Professor Galeotti, speaking on the BBC Radio 4 Putin podcast, aired in April last year, explained that in 2008 “a big deal” was being made about the preservation of the Siberian tiger and naturally “Putin had to get in on the act with a photo op”.
He continued: “There was this splendid Siberian tiger called Serga which had been tranquillised so that it could be fitted with a chip and generally sort of checked before being released.”
A TV crew was on deck to make sure they captured plenty of footage of Putin with the tiger.
But, as Putin arrived, a tiger escaped and ran towards the television crew. The former KGB agent, dressed in camouflage and combat boots, was said to have acted quickly, shooting the big cat with a tranquilliser gun.
He was dubbed a hero, hailed by the Russian media for saving a television crew from being attacked by a wild Siberian tiger. The news was given plenty of airtime.
A presenter told Rossiya television on the evening of the incident: “Vladimir Putin not only managed to see the giant predator up close but also saved our television crew too.”
He then helped measure the teeth of the Amur tiger, which can weigh up to 450kg, and fitted it with a satellite transmitter.
READ MORE: Putin’s wife ‘really loved him but he didn’t love her back’
However, it later emerged that this was not quite how the day had played out.
Professor Galeotti explained: “What had actually happened is they had taken a tiger from a zoo and trucked it a long way to the relevant site. And of course, Putin was running late as ever, so they had to re-tranquilise the tiger so that it wouldn’t cause any particular risk to the President when he finally arrived.”
“But then of course he had to be shown tranquilising it. Anyway, he did his photo op, he tranquilised the tiger, he stroked it, he gave it a little kiss — how nice — and then off he went.
“After the cameras were turned off, the tiger was returned to the zoo where, unfortunately, it died. It died because it had been given three tranquiliser shots when really it only needed one. But nonetheless, this was the price for Putin’s photo-op.”
According to the WWF, the Amur tiger is now “highly endangered” with there being an estimated 500 left in the wild.
DON’T MISS:
Meghan admitted to being ‘people-pleasing little girl’ in blog [REPORT]
London nursery fees set to hit 80% of average monthly wage in April [ANALYSIS]
POLL – Was Matt Hancock negligent in the handling of Covid [POLL]
Putin’s website later showed images of what appeared to be the same tiger he had tranquilised back in the wild. But according to several environmentalists such as Dmitry Molodtsov, who runs a website about big cats, the tiger Putin shot was not the same one shown in the video.
Mr Molodtsov concluded that the one on the website was in fact the docile animal from the Khabarovsk zoo which had been transported hundreds of miles to the Ussuri nature reserve specifically for the event. He too found that the creature died as it was unable to recover from the three consecutive tranquiliser shots.
Masha Vorontsova, head of the Russian branch of the International Fund for Animal Welfare, told the Guardian in 2012: “It should have been one tranquilliser shot, but it was three in a short period of time.
“I’m not even blaming Putin, but the people who do these things for him — all they are interested in is big money. It’s against all scientific and human ethics.”
Source: Read Full Article
-
Tesco using barriers as shoppers try snatch reduced items from staff
-
Thugs who sold silenced pistol to terrorists are freed from jail
-
Politically motivated terrorism emerges as new threat globally
-
US judge DROPS lawsuit against MBS over murder of Jamal Khashoggi
-
Insurers call for ban on spinal cord stimulator subsidies after new trial